


The statistical significance was evaluated by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS (statistical package for social sciences) Ver. Statistical analyses were supported by IBM SPSS for Windows version 21 (IBM Corp) and SAS (SAS Institute Inc). If University determines that Contractor failed to implement the HSP in good faith, University, in addition to any other remedies, may report nonperformance to the SPSS in accordance with 34 TAC§§20.285(g)(5), 20.585 and 20.586. Once translated, all of the completed assessments were scored by the author,11 and the assessment scores, along with all of the data from the demographic questionnaires, were manually entered into SPSS. University may report nonperformance under this Agreement to the SPSS in accordance with 34 TAC §§20.285(g)(5), 20.585 and 20.586.

We used IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 to run all statistical analyses.įollow-up analysis, in which results on individual critical thinking skill scores were compared between groups, took the form of either univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) or independent samples t-tests.12 All of the analysis was conducted by the author, using SPSS. Frequency domain mea- sures were divided by spectral power analysis into high (0.15–0.40 Hz), low (0.04–0.15 Hz), and very low- frequency (0.00–0.04 Hz) powers with total power calcu- lated as the sum of all powers.20 Variables were left con- tinuous due to a lack of cut-off values established to indicate pathology.Statistical analysisStatistical analysis was performed in Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences V.22 for Windows ( SPSS, Chicago, USA).
